After 35+ years studying human behavior, 20+ years doing the Practical Empathy Practice (PEP), and some dabbling in evolutionary biology/psychology/sociology, I’ve come to the conclusion that we’re naturally wired to help each other. Your daily acts of kindness aren’t small. They’re evidence.
Clues all around us
Sure, we get caught up in our daily stress. We scroll past news that makes us feel helpless. We forget how powerful simple kindness can be.
But watch what happens when someone drops their groceries in a parking lot. Or when a neighbor’s power goes out. Or when a stranger looks lost.
People help. Without thinking. Without expecting anything back.
In my practice groups, I’ve watched thousands of people discover this truth about themselves. We’ve run 650+ meetings, and every single time, participants leave amazed at their own capacity for generosity.
The science backs this up too. Our brains are literally wired for empathy. We mirror each other’s emotions automatically. We feel good when we help others because that’s how we’re designed.
Your daily acts of kindness – holding a door, listening to a friend, letting someone merge in traffic – these aren’t small things. They’re proof of your natural goodness showing up.
The world needs more people who remember this about themselves.
If you want to dive deeper into understanding how empathy actually works and how to strengthen yours, check out “A Practical EmPath Rewire Your Mind.” It’s everything I’ve learned about turning our natural compassion into a superpower.
Your kindness matters more than you know.
Evolutionary factors
From Evolutionary Biology
Neurological substrates are conserved across species. The brain regions associated with empathy – the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and mirror neuron systems—are present in other mammals, not just humans. This suggests these structures evolved before humans diverged from other primates and were retained because they served adaptive functions.
Empathy appears in non-human animals. Rats will free trapped companions even when offered chocolate as an alternative. Elephants console distressed herd members. Chimpanzees and bonobos show spontaneous helping behavior and emotional contagion. This cross-species presence suggests empathy predates humanity.
From Evolutionary Psychology
Kin selection and reciprocal altruism. Empathy facilitates behaviors that make evolutionary sense: caring for genetically related offspring and kin (spreading shared genes), and building cooperative relationships with non-kin who may reciprocate later. Empathy serves as the proximate emotional mechanism that motivates these ultimately adaptive behaviors.
The “expensive” nature of empathic responses. Empathy involves real physiological costs – stress hormones rise when we witness others’ distress. Evolution typically eliminates costly traits unless they confer benefits, suggesting empathy must have provided significant survival or reproductive advantages.
From Evolutionary Sociology
Human ultrasociality depends on empathy. Humans live in unusually large, cooperative groups compared to other primates. Empathy likely co-evolved with this social complexity, enabling coordination, trust, and the suppression of free-riding that would otherwise undermine group cohesion.
Cooperative breeding and alloparenting*. Unlike most great apes, humans rely on non-mothers (fathers, grandparents, others) to help raise children. This “cooperative breeding” system requires empathic attunement to infant needs from individuals who aren’t the biological mother – a trait that would have been selected for over generations.
These lines of evidence converge on the idea that empathy wasn’t a cultural invention but an adaptation shaped by selection pressures favoring social coordination, caregiving, and cooperation.
*Alloparenting refers to caregiving provided by individuals other than the biological parents—the prefix “allo-” means “other” in Greek.
In humans, this includes grandparents watching children, aunts and uncles helping out, older siblings caring for younger ones, and unrelated community members pitching in. Essentially, it’s the “it takes a village” phenomenon given a scientific name.
This is relatively unusual among great apes. Chimpanzee and gorilla mothers are typically the sole caregivers for their infants and are protective about others handling them. Humans, by contrast, routinely hand babies off to others and depend on this distributed care.
Anthropologist Sarah Hrdy has argued this was a pivotal shift in human evolution. Human infants are extraordinarily costly to raise—large brains, long developmental periods, high caloric needs—and a mother alone likely couldn’t have managed without help. Alloparenting allowed human ancestors to successfully raise these “expensive” offspring, and it may have simultaneously selected for greater empathic and mind-reading abilities in both caregivers (who needed to attune to infants who weren’t their own) and in infants (who needed to engage and appeal to multiple potential caregivers, not just mom).
So alloparenting is both a social arrangement and, potentially, a driver of the cognitive and emotional capacities that make humans distinctively social.
For more about my “A Practical EmPath Rewire Your Mind” book, visit
https://clearsay.net/get-the-book-a-practical-empath.
Recent Comments