12 minute talk on Chapter 8 – “From anger to peace” from Practical Empathy Practice from the book A Practical EmPath: Rewire Your Mind by Scott Howard Swain.

video created with the help of AI tools

12 minute talk on Chapter 8 – “From anger to peace” from Practical Empathy Practice (PEP) from the book A Practical EmPath: Rewire Your Mind by Scott Howard Swain.

Practical Empathy Practice (PEP) is a communication method similar to Nonviolent Communication (NVC) aiming to foster understanding and connection. This 16-minute talk is on Chapter 8, “From anger to peace”.

The core of PEP involves a four-step process: **objective observation**, identifying **feelings**, recognizing underlying **values/needs**, and making **positive, actionable requests**. The text emphasizes distinguishing observations from evaluations and using “wants” or “values” instead of “needs” for clearer communication in everyday settings. Examples of both clinical and casual PEP conversations illustrate how the method works in practice. The ultimate goal is to build stronger relationships by fostering empathy and clear communication.

Briefing Document: Managing Anger with Practical Empathy Practice (PEP)

Source: Excerpts from “Ch08-From-Anger-to-Peace.pdf” (Chapter 8 of “A Practical EmPath: Rewire Your Mind” by Scott Howard Swain)

Executive Summary:

This document outlines the principles and practices of Practical Empathy Practice (PEP), a framework for transforming anger into peaceful understanding and connection. PEP emphasizes shifting from automatic reactions to conscious responses based on identifying unmet needs and fostering empathy for oneself and others. The goal is to rewire the brain to react with curiosity and understanding rather than defensiveness.

Key Themes and Ideas:

  1. Practical Empathy Practice (PEP):
  • PEP is a method of communication (both internal and external) designed to: “liberate, understand, strengthen connection, increase responsibility, display clarity, and empower self and others.”
  • The core of PEP revolves around understanding needs and values, which are considered synonymous in this context. It involves:
  • Observation without Evaluation: Focusing on the other person’s words, not interpreting body language (although being mindful of it subconsciously).
  • Feeling: Recognizing your own feelings and attempting to guess the feelings of others.
  • Values/Needs/Motives/Wants: Identifying your own and others’ underlying needs and values.
  • PEP avoids attributing feelings to others’ actions directly, emphasizing personal responsibility for emotional responses. Instead of saying “You made me feel,” the focus is on “Did you feel… when you saw/heard…?”
  1. From Reaction to Response:
  • The document challenges the idea that we are powerless over our emotions. It proposes that we can reprogram our reactions to triggers.
  • The key is to move away from the “lizard brain” (automatic, defensive reactions) and cultivate more control over thoughts and feelings.
  • “It is possible to train ourselves to have more control over our own thoughts, and eventually, even the ‘automatic’ feelings that occur when our senses are stimulated.”
  1. The Three Stages of Emotional Regulation:
  • Stage 1 (Automatic Reaction): Reacting defensively, withdrawing, or attacking, driven by fear and/or anger. Blaming others.
  • Stage 2 (Self-Empathy): Taking responsibility for your feelings by identifying unmet needs. Asking, “What values / needs of mine are not being met when this thing happens?” Example: “I wanted more understanding and consideration.”
  • Stage 3 (Empathy for Others): Understanding the other person’s motivation by asking, “What might be going on for that other person to motivate them to say such a thing?” Example: “Maybe she lashed out because she wanted more acceptance or appreciation for her ideas?”
  • Through consistent practice of these stages, individuals can train their brains to react less defensively.
  1. The Importance of Needs:
  • Anger often stems from unmet needs.
  • Identifying and communicating these needs is crucial for moving away from blame and defensiveness and toward mutual understanding and connection. “One of the key principles of PEP is the focus on needs rather than demands.”
  1. Rewiring the Brain:
  • With repeated practice of self-empathy and empathy for others, the brain learns that defensiveness is often unnecessary.
  • “With each repetition of this pattern of ‘initial defensiveness → empathy → ah no defense needed’ we are training our brains to eventually realize the ‘initial defensiveness’ is not necessary in most situations.”
  • This leads to “automatic empathy with the other person,” reducing stress and improving relationships.
  1. Acceptance: Approaching situations with empathy means understanding needs and feelings without judgement or blame, creating space for mutual respect.

Practical Application/Exercises:

The document provides several exercises for applying PEP to manage anger:

  • Exercise 1: Reflect on a recent anger-inducing situation, identify the unmet need, and practice self-empathy (“It’s okay that I feel angry. I understand that I have a need for…”).
  • Exercise 2: Empathize with someone who angered you by considering their potential unmet needs (“Perhaps the other person’s need for… was not met. I can try to approach this situation with curiosity and understanding.”).
  • Exercise 3: Identify an alternative response to a past situation where you reacted with anger and visualize yourself using that response.
  • Exercise 4: Practice empathy towards someone who reacted with anger towards you by trying to understand their underlying needs.

Key Quotes:

  • “Through empathy and self-awareness, we rewrite the script of our reactions, paving the way for peaceful resolutions and personal growth.” ~ Arun Gandhi, paraphrased
  • “I’m pissed off because my needs for security, respect, efficiency, and consideration were not met.” (Example of self-empathy)

Caveats:

  • Mastering PEP requires time, effort, and a willingness to be vulnerable.
  • The document simplifies the complexity of anger, acknowledging that it can stem from various underlying emotions like frustration, pain, or fear. “So, until a better idea comes along, I propose that while yes, sometimes it is fear, sometimes it can be frustration.”
  • The author recognizes that PEP can take time and practice. “This process can take time and much practice before you start to notice the sweet sweet relief of automatic empathy for others. Do not give up! It took your author many years and many stages.”

Conclusion:

The excerpt presents PEP as a practical and effective method for managing anger by fostering empathy and understanding. By consciously identifying unmet needs and practicing empathy, individuals can rewire their brains to respond to triggers with curiosity and compassion, leading to more peaceful and fulfilling relationships and a greater sense of personal power.